…one only hopes that this is not another fleeting national discourse, propelled by the sweetness of its rhetoric narrative than by shared determination. It is hoped that the inundation and preponderance of the argument for restructuring is driven by our solid conviction and collective readiness and willingness to achieve political reorganisation of Nigeria.
The growing ethnic-based political tension and the seeming despondency in the country have heightened and pushed the need for Nigeria’s long overdue political and economic restructuring to the front burner in recent times. From a renewed distasteful secessionist agitation, which has been ostensibly incongruous with reason, to the affront and threat to our bond of unity by some elements in the country. The clarion call for the restructuring of the country has never been louder, and the need to respond to this indispensable invitation is imperative. I am happy that the elites who hitherto ‘shied away’ from the subject of Nigeria’s political repositioning are today in support for it. I am happy that for once, many Nigerians have openly acknowledged the inherent advantages of restructuring and its execution as a matter of urgent national importance. It is a good development that the consensus is building around the benefit of restructuring to every majority tribe and the marginalised minority ones.
Historically, what is today a clamour for our country’s political restructuring began in the colonial days through the agitation for independence. Lord Lugard amalgamated the present units into one in 1914 for administrative convenience, a move which marked the beginning of the current regional “marriage of convenience”. In search of relevance and political participation, the nationalists felt it was time to take over the reins of leadership for the betterment of the citizens and thus began a crusade for a new structure in the administration of Nigeria, with much emphasis on self-rule. This later came to pass in 1960 with Nigeria taking a new political structure as the Union Jack was lowered. This ended the first phase of the restructuring of the nation. However, the times of these events were not as perilous as they are presently. The fabric of patriotism and sincerity in leadership was yet to be torn into shreds on the altar of ethnicity, religion, corruption, exploitation, exclusion and marginalisation.
The call for restructuring has always arisen from fear of marginalisation, especially among true minorities, not the self-tagged minorities who have major stakes in the political space. If there are groups in the Nigerian nation that should crave for restructuring, these should be the down-trodden souls of the Niger Delta region who have had their total wellbeing mortgaged in the Nigerian project.
Over the years, agitations for restructuring came with the call for resource control, the federal character principle, true federalism and even the 35 percent affirmative action for women to increase their participation in governance, alongside the agitation for more youth participation in government.
Today, this call has gained the status of a socio-political philosophy and struggle; maybe it is a philosophy driven too slowly by our leaders, past and present. The call for it is often very loud within political manifestoes but when power is acquired, our leaders shy away from putting out the revolutionary ideals they proclaimed by either doing little or nothing to effect a restructured Nigeria. History proves this to be the case. General Ibrahim Babangida came on board and ended up creating states. His successor, General Sanni Abacha severed the country into six geo-political zones; President Olusegun Obasanjo came and avoided the many urgent questions on the country’s structure; while President Musa Yar’Adua came with a 7-point agenda and also avoiding many nagging questions pertaining to Nigeria’s multi-structural deficits. President Goodluck Jonathan tarried till toward his terminal days in office when he convoked a summit, in that guise, with limited time to address pressing national issues. The report was hurriedly brewed and submitted but is yet to be publicly unveiled, studied and implemented. Beyond rhetoric, therefore, at no point have we truly forged an agenda for restructuring Nigeria. The political will to do so has never really been there.
Restructuring the nation along the lines of true federalism with emphasis on resource control is a key factor in having stability and national peace. This will enhance capacity building, an economic boom among the component units who will be eager to tap, explore and process their resources for common good…
As it stands, Nigeria is under a socio-political siege impregnated with many upheavals. Ethnic and religious tensions are on the rise and motherly love has grown cold. Some are bent on taking the path of secession, while political and economic stagnation holds sway. In the face of all these problems arises a dire need for the nation to be restructured holistically along the lines of concrete reality. If indeed our federalism is to work, it has to be re-shaped to be all-encompassing, enduring and able to allay the fears of all and sundry.
To this end, the need for political restructuring arises. It is common knowledge that countries restructure by carrying out far-reaching reforms often through the determined entrenchment of true fiscal federalism, ensuring resource control, state policing, flexibility of legislative powers between state and federal legislatures, and local government autonomy.
To put things in perspective, how many of us calling for the restructuring of Nigeria are ready to support true fiscal federalism and absolute resource control? How many of us are ready to support the decentralisation of state security so that federating units could run a state police side by side national policing? Restructuring entails decentralisation, devolution of power, and de-concentration of the country’s governance through a carefully structured decentralisation reform programme geared towards complete political and economic restructuring.
Restructuring the nation along the lines of true federalism with emphasis on resource control is a key factor in having stability and national peace. This will enhance capacity building, an economic boom among the component units who will be eager to tap, explore and process their resources for common good, as only a reasonable percentage will be paid to the centre. This will end the current master-servant relationship, the cold war and the disaffection going on between the states and the federal government. It will also ensure speedy all round development in terms of infrastructure, jobs, whilst promoting a sense of belonging and fulfilment.
Introducing and maintaining a viable state police force will be a significant step in a restructured Nigeria. A state police force dominated by mainly indigenes of the state makes crime fighting and security challenges less cumbersome. The geographical location becomes a familiar one to any crime buster, while the state police would work hand in hand with the federal police under mutual cooperation arrangements.
…a truly restructured Nigeria would make for a less politically attractive centre and enable the fact that states would look into their areas of comparative economic advantage as a major step towards achieving peace. We cannot afford to sit on the fence and watch our nation, destined for greatness, degenerate into anarchy.
For citizens to benefit more from legislations, we want to see a devolution of power; one which will boost matters in the concurrent legislative list and allow state assemblies to legislate on certain matters in the exclusive legislative list. The National Assembly must relax its powers in certain areas which directly impact on the people. Such areas include power, solid minerals/mining, water ways management, etc. This shall boost the revenue base of states.
Local government autonomy is very essential in the delivery of democratic dividends to the people. Such autonomy must be inclusive of the finances that accrue to the councils without any intermediary.
As a corollary, a truly restructured Nigeria would make for a less politically attractive centre and enable the fact that states would look into their areas of comparative economic advantage as a major step towards achieving peace. We cannot afford to sit on the fence and watch our nation, destined for greatness, degenerate into anarchy. The benefits of having a restructured nation are innumerable and must be tapped for the rapid growth of today’s Nigeria and for posterity. But are we genuinely ready to press for it?
As the intensity of the call takes root across the country, one only hopes that this is not another fleeting national discourse, propelled by the sweetness of its rhetoric narrative than by shared determination. It is hoped that the inundation and preponderance of the argument for restructuring is driven by our solid conviction and collective readiness and willingness to achieve political reorganisation of Nigeria. For instance, our readiness to achieve restructuring should begin to show in how seriously we take the implementation of the recommendations of the 2014 national conference report and the ongoing constitution review exercise. We should begin to discuss restructuring in the real context of it. We cannot talk about restructuring without discussing the knotty issues of a 100 percent resource control by states, autonomy for local governments, devolution of power, and decongestion of government at the centre. Until this is done, we are not ready to restructure and attain our full potential as a people.
Onofiok Luke is Speaker, Akwa Ibom State House of Assembly.
PremiumTimes
END
Be the first to comment