On the other hand, the Lagos State Government wasted no time in defending its action by stating that it held meetings with the leadership of the market where an agreement was reached to relocate the traders to Isopakodowo Market in Bolade, Oshodi. And it said it even projected its human face by allowing the traders pay a “paltry N5,000 monthly” as rent for the new market, said to boast of bigger stores and is generally a befitting alternative for the traders. Government also claims to have issued a notice to quit to the traders before moving in to carry out the demolition that fateful morning.
What is not clear is whether the representatives of the traders who held the said meeting with the state government communicated the decision reached at the meeting with their members. As is with any matter that affects the livelihood of the masses (even if temporarily), the event of the wee hours of last Wednesday has unsurprisingly elicited many sentimental responses. Some people have even gone on a tangent to declare the move as tribal, since many of the traders are of Igbo origin.
It is worthy of note that this is only the second time in six years that the state government would be embarking on major developmental work in Oshodi. The first being the immediate past governor of the state, Babatunde Fashola’s efforts in 2009, which transformed the fearful area, infamously known for criminal activities, into a much better place with a far less threatening aura. Nevertheless, I for one have never believed that it was all Uhuru in Oshodi, especially after the early days that followed the change in government. A regular commuter on that route, particularly at night can hardly miss the gradual return of impunity and gridlock in the area, and more worrying, the growing number of street urchins and miscreants who constantly harass motorists and passersby. At the height of their resurgence, touts and hoodlums brazenly robbed motorists daily by smashing the side glass of their cars, inflicting injury on some of them in the process.
And so, when the Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Mr. Steve Ayorinde, stated that the main reason the government decided to demolish the market was to secure the lives and property of the residents and the general populace, it resonated with many. Divulging further that weapons were found in bunkers within the market, I had no cause to doubt what he said.
Oshodi is one part of Lagos which by default has the propensity to erupt in violence at any time. What with the ever present cult gangs whose constant battle for supremacy ensures that a full blown mayhem is only a hair’s breath away from simmering to the surface. The plan to construct an ultra modern bus terminal complete with the full complements of a standard bus shelter in line with the bigger picture of getting Lagos to the enviable status of living up to its potential of becoming a mega city in the mould of New York or Johannesburg is laudable.
Having stated that, when it comes to matters that hugely affect the livelihood of the common man, it is difficult to hold a strait-laced view devoid of sentiments. The truth is that anyone who’s directly or indirectly (particularly those who have done legitimate business there for many years) affected by the demolition would hardly be in the right frame of mind to reason with the government regardless of its noble intentions. A situation where the traders were given ample time to sort themselves out would have been ideal. A notice of three weeks or thereabout is not enough for someone who has occupied a particular place for a long time to shift base. Government can rightly state that it has provided an alternative for the traders, but the said alternative was only being renovated after the former base of the traders had been demolished. All renovations and logistics involved in moving the traders should have been taken care of before the demolition.
A good number of us clamoured for change from the status quo. It’s important to accept that there is no change that comes without some form of discomfort. Paraphrasing the popular saying: It is foolhardy to do things the same way, and expect a different a result. Any significant progress that is made in life; be it the life of an individual, corporate body or state/country will most likely come with some degree of discomfort or adjustment.
The construction of the road in my part of town resulted in several fences and shops being earmarked for demolition (and subsequently demolished) in order to give way for the expansion of the road. Many of us were affected. And though it was a less than amusing situation at the time given that affected residents had to find ways to cough up money hitherto not budgeted for to reconstruct fences and shops, at the end of the day, most agreed (albeit grudgingly) that it was for the greater good of all. Today, even though the road construction has yet to be fully completed, there’s a huge difference between what used to obtain plying that route and the reprieve everyone can feel now.
There really is no gain without pain. Change should hardly be defined by a slogan we chant every now and then without fully grasping its import and application to our daily lives. At the end of the day, any action taken in the interest of the larger populace trumps any individual or group interests in any part of the world. And that’s the way it should be.
PUNCH
END
Hmmm, balanced write up.
This is wickedness of the highest order.
Man inhumananity to man on tribalistic alter.