Dilemma of the Nigerian Youth, By Gimba Kakanda
These past weeks, I’ve had reason to reflect more on the place of the Nigerian youth in politics and public service. The inspiration for this was the hypocrisy I witnessed all the times our gerontocratic political establishment opened its door for the young join to them. The strangest dilemma is this: the youth advocate inclusion in governance and participation in politics, yet any time a young person is offered an appointment, the first argument is over his or her “lack of experience”. Furthermore, how an “experienced” person ought to occupy such an office. “Experience” has always been a code for age, it is gotten by years and not competence. Just be old enough and, ergo, you are garlanded with “experience” as well.
This near predictable trend of reaction was witnessed most recently with the appointment of Ms. Hadiza Bala Usman as Managing Director of Nigerian Ports Authority. The loudest and, to me, the only known, critics of her appointment were members of her constituency: the political youth. She was portrayed as not only a creation of opportunism, but one lacking requisite experience and age to manage an organisation that complex.
One may then wish to know what our generation means by advocating inclusion in government. How is that a logical demand when one of us is suddenly seen as unqualified, by us, on the basis of her age? One may also wish to know whether those older were chosen on the basis of track records earned in an extraterrestrial world. I mean, whether those older have always been older. It didn’t matter to the critics that Hadiza has had fair experience working with the current governor of Kaduna State, and has been involved in some of the nation’s most effective administrative reforms and political and social advocacies. This is what some of her detractors chose to miss—that she understands the architecture and intricacies of the Nigeria the same youths have been furiously asking for.
Some of us who support the “Not Too Young to Run” bill and campaign aren’t doing so in agreement with the view that the youths are (potentially) smarter administrators or that they possess extraordinary traits no longer exhibited by the older generation. A friend of mine, in the period running up to the 2015 presidential election, promoted Candidate Muhammadu Buhari as the most qualified, citing age as his reason. I dismissed that as an affront to younger Nigerians, because such insidious and dangerous thinking only justifies the very gerontocracy our generation is allying to demolish. One may be tempted to ask the youths to come together and form a strong political alliance or a party in a bid to restate their relevance, size and actual capacity to govern. The youths, according to National Bureau of Statistics data, make up 70 percent of the nation’s population. But the same youths that ought to champion a campaign for good governance, inclusion and relevance are divided in defence of their oppressors on social media and various fora – virtual and offline. The same youths are betting to meet at Sofa Lounge for fisticuffs!
It’s hard to determine the ratio of conscious youths to those who are nonchalant. Our problems require strategic and gradual alliance and inclusion to eventually correct this systemic exclusion. The advocacy shouldn’t be that youths are smarter, but that they are capable, and shouldn’t be wasted as inconsequential errand boys, which is what some of these PAs, SAs, SSAs are. Because if youths came with the exceptional vision to lead, the newly independent Nigeria, managed by youths, would’ve been a good foundation for us. Similarly, if old age means a thing in governance, Nigeria would’ve been a model nation, from the youths who took over from colonialists to today’s grandpas.
We may allow the idealists to go with their divergent theorisation of the youths as sharper visionaries or as symbols of new ideas. What we know for a fact is, past attempts to unify the youths and establish a strong force in our political equation have failed. Woefully. Today, we remember promising youth groups and advocacies we once embraced as our salvation, with troubling nostalgia. From 20MillionYouthsFor2015 campaign to Generational Voices, the hope was high, and down it came crashing.
Dazzled by the composition and vision of Generational Voices, I wrote then: “I’m happy that I was not a distant witness of Generational Voices. Having been closely involved, and in deep thought, I see a movement about to be built on the foundations of OccupyNigeria, that deferred revolution. But as beautiful as its grand visions are, we have to resist ideological indoctrination and correctly understand that GenVoices is not OccupyNigeria. This is where our task commences.”
Unfortunately, like all before it, it didn’t go as anticipated. Perhaps we were too hungry to recognise its essence. Perhaps our partisan allegiances frustrated its growth into a required force. Whatever, we need to restate our political will by overcoming this seemingly genetic political skepticism. Affirmative action from the establishment may be frowned at by some, but that, and not our polarisation, is really what we need, to defeat perceived marginalisation of the youth. May God save us from us!
@GimbaKakanda On Twitter